SAND, SALT
AND SYMBOL: Spirituality in ‘at the beach’ experiences
By Gregory Smith
Unpublished paper for the inaugural Youth
Spirituality Series, the University of Queensland Chaplaincy
Series 2014
Presenation at the April 2015 Spiritual Care Australia Hobart
Conference "The Ground of our Being." What sustains me?
ABSTRACT
Robust spiritualities feed upon aesthetics as
aesthetic experiences better mediate the sacred silences occurring at intersections of sacred and
profane. Aesthetic experiences are moments of transcendence
enabling initiates to return to an otherwise bland world
refreshed, recharged and transformed. One area of
enchantment is the Australian beach that is rich in
associations about growing up and it offers a focus for
environmental action. For the beach
experience offers unique creative spaces to access some of the
subliminal and saving meanings in our lives. The paper argues
that reading the
natural environment found at the beach in the way Gadamer does
excites increased responsibility for it and for the self. Such
an aesthetic reading offers a method for building a
contemporary and relevant spirituality. The paper shows that
meaningful spiritualities can be built outside formal
religious structures.

Media grab: The paper explores the possibility of
devising a satisfying spirituality upon aesthetic experiences
like the Australian beach. The three fold process values
experience, understands it such as in metaphors, and seeks
applications for life. The process is based on Gadamer's
hermeneutic where a "reading " mandates moral attitudes and
applications. The paper envisages a viable spirituality as a
framework for seeking meaning, for explaining what happens to
one and for connecting to the web of life. Such developed
understandings frame daily routines and justify conservation of
the environment.
KEYWORDS: spirituality, transformation, Gadamer, identity, connectedness, transcendence, aesthetics
serving theology.
6198 words
Overview
The beach offers a spirituality that
is clean, simple, and accesses the eternal. Forever offering
replenishment, clean air, blue sea, and freedom from the grime
of urban life, the beach is Australians' preferred escape.
Without complication, initiation or internship, its cleansing
powers offer both physical and metaphysical refreshment,
relief and renewal. Beach experiences entice and satisfy;
engagement saturates the senses while that exchange explains
itself. Any participation at the beach is rewarded many times
over. At the beach, the initiate soon becomes the master; its
way of life directly rewards its adherents. The beach's
rhythms access the eternal in their reassuring continuities,
just as its elemental substances ground the conscious
experience for enhanced awareness. Finally, the beach's sheer
simplicity engages, challenges and disciplines its devotees at
subliminal levels in its impact upon body, mind and spirit.
Such an engagement with the seasons and cycles of beach life
mandates a commitment to sustainability as a suitable
ecospirituality in our times.
Script
Introduction
I invite
you today to join me in an experiment launching another focus
for spirituality. We conduct this experiment in our own living
culture without being able to identify all the possibilities
but well able to steer our way. This experiment is like
launching a fragile paper boat with all the excitement and
risk that that entails.
Our experiment
assumes that quite often a group freely gathers round a
powerful focus, and that this interest has an explicit power
to unite them and justify their fascination. In this case,
that fascination is the lifestyle focused upon the beach
experience.
As I lead you
into this spirituality, I invite you to calibrate it against
our own experiences of spirituality, because it is but one
among many. I call this paper boat a ‘Spirituality of the At
the Beach Experience’. For this is an exercise of looking in
from the outside so we may understand how people any practise
their spirituality, those frameworks of ultimate meaning by
which people today find meaning in life. This paper is a
considered attempt to explore values and practices that appear
in Australian society. I thus acknowledge those people who
hold these beliefs as their genuine attempt to give shape to
the existences they lead.
So to
background this paper, it is fair to say that the rise of such
new spiritualities is evidence of the interiorization of
religion going on today.
In our own materialistic
society, where there is much hungering for experiences of God,
the presentation of the static doctrines of the past offers
little satisfaction. Everywhere in
the wider culture there is a fascination with mystery,
authenticity and good clean living. This explosion of new spiritualities is too
easily dismissed as individualistic, and reflective of
consumerist attitudes and lifestyles. Often the result is an
uncritical mixture forever seeking greater substance and
stability. In their use of aids like candles, icons, silence, chant
and hints of mysticism, people today seek to build
themselves a viable spirituality in
a self-conscious search for spiritual answers. They hold there is more to
life than materialism, and by building spirituality they piece
together an eclectic set of beliefs by which to live a more
fulfilling life.
Intuitive, artistic and creative forces drive seekers of spirituality. For aesthetic experiences very often better mediate the sacred than do doctrinal formulations because they employ the language of the imagination. Using the poetic or ‘aesthetic imagination’, seekers of Beauty can actually live in the mystery of the Reality they seek; for they grow from creative impulses that are more experiential and personal and so are more authentic. Embodying one’s belief has greater cogency in a postmodern world. Seekers of transcendence at the beach find richer templates for human happiness in valuing bodily integrity. In support, James Fowler writes: “The processes, the changes, the waxing and waning of our lives as bodies, is integral to our spiritual lives.”[1] In effect, this paper draws attention to the richer path of cultural aesthetics in the effort to build spirituality.
Historical and cultural context
In a post-modern environment,
no one model can adequately ascribe enough significant meaning
to artistic experiences, nor can a single text be offered to
access infinite Beauty. Many find that the
unique model of creative imagination can glean worthwhile
results using interpretative processes or hermeneutics. A
spirituality that lives by the cycles of nature offers
remarkable refreshment. Thus, the model of ‘the beach experience’ can
offer everyone a much-needed centralizing ‘pull to the
sublime’, for generating human happiness. It offers a proven
help to overcome “the intense emptiness of modernity” says
poet Les A. Murray.
The world needs some spiritual liberations, some
experiences that can be savoured as satisfactory and
transcendental. Through the twentieth century, humanism and
existentialism failed to offer transcendence with the result
that attempts to explore alternatives ways of living broke out
in the 1980s. Today’s spiritualities evoke refreshment and
debunk meaninglessness. Spirituality offers a net of meanings
for understanding ourselves and the world.
Because
of “the lack of an assured place for religion in our public
life,”[2]
individuals feel free to explore ‘the deeper issues’. In
our culture of indifferentism and scepticism about religion,[3]
there is a huge silence about religion in Australian society.
Theologian Tony
Kelly writes, “In the Australian conversation, there's
timidity and embarrassment about religion.”[4].
However in fact, the laconic Australian national
character respects the private world – maybe
refusing to say something is saying something. Such immanence
in fact grows an Australian
mysticism. That private world explores the silences
occurring at the intersection of sacred and profane, as unique
creative spaces for accessing some of the subliminal and
saving meanings of our lives. As our leading poet Judith
Wright says, silence is “where the truth waits to be heard.”[5]
Builders of spirituality shape those silences into creative
significance. Thus they practise an
increasing interiorization of religion in the rise
of new forms of spirituality.
Coincidentally,
today’s new interest in spirituality readily aligns with
environmental concerns and shows a strong identification with
the natural world. So this exercise seeking transcendence over
greed and exploitation is timely. Accordingly, in any exercise of
the aesthetic imagination, the concept of hope overcomes
despair.
Valuing aesthetics in spirituality
The
method presented here employs theological aesthetics whereby
the seeker of spirituality builds upon common environmental
experiences to find grounds for continuity and hope in today’s search for
meaning. The aim is to retrieve one practice of insightful
experience in a modality increasingly acknowledged as valid.
It is a hermeneutical experiment. It is but one of many
attempting an ecospirituality with substance. Sally McFague[6]
uses
the image of a ‘quilting bee’ where individuals in a rather
haphazard way sew on their fragment to the academic endeavour
of ecospirituality.
This discussion will argue the value of prizing
aesthetic experiences as relevant and effective pathways to
God. People searching for God today seek to meet that Presence
in ritual, in aesthetics and in fulfilling human encounters.
The believer engaging in aesthetic experience already brings
to it a greater openness to reality. The believer hungers for rich layers in
experience, actively seeking to find identity, connectedness
and transcendence through deep appreciation of the textures of
sounds, symbols or rhythms broken open in reflection upon the
localised particularities of experience and pain, to obtain
some transcendence over the unrestrained forces that lead to
unhappiness. Theological aesthetics reconceptualises everyday
experience within the larger picture of God’s Providential
actions. Thus, ‘faith in God’ becomes a lived moment of
embodied exaltation rather than a mere affirmation of a verbal
creed.
More generally, spirituality gives shape to life; it frames all one’s actions and even explains what one does. It explains one’s personal routine through the day or an array of idiosyncratic preferences. As a work of the imagination, spirituality offers an “enlargement of consciousness” (Coulson[7]). As products of the imagination, literary tropes for instance can eminently well image a better world. Poet David Malouf reports an inductive, embodied wisdom. He touches on its explaining power in his novel, The Great World,[8] when his character discourses upon “all those unique and repeatable events, the little sacraments of daily existence, movements of the heart and intimations of the close but inexpressible grandeur and terror of things that is our other history, the one that goes on, in a quiet way, under the noise and chatter of events and is a major part of what happens each day in the life of the planet, and has been from the beginning. ”
So importantly, spirituality describes and explains one’s lifestyle. Its attitudes, actions and routines express hidden values and strong assumptions about what is the best way to face life’s uncertainties. If those actions contain rites, then they can be more easily identified; if they derive from aesthetic experiences say at the beach, they may mandate moral responsibilities about protecting the shoreline and all life forms gathered there. In that sense then, whether spirituality is shared or personal, overall it describes, explains and motivates attitudes, habits and practices of everyday life. It comes to the fore in crises because it gives coherence to life.
Spirituality gives a set of life-defining beliefs and practices. It offers five features:
· Connectedness; an enduring and durable perspective; a framework for understanding the world; gives transcendent meaning to life; sense of wonder, awe and “otherness”
· Refuge and support in crisis: it speaks beyond the merely rational
· Cause and commitment: priorities and goals: how to spend one’s time, what to pay attention to
· Consolations: a way to deepen our relationship with the transcendent; access to the spirit dimension of the human person; ways to rebuff darkness of soul, disturbance, attractions to things low and earthly, disquiet of different agitations; reasons to reject apathy, complacency and smugness
· Health, hope and hygiene of the mind.
Building spirituality takes time and commitment. It is a nurturing process into a relationship with the Creator Spirit or Huey and all of creation. Accordingly, in the ebb and flow of sensations in an aesthetic experience, the actant, initiate or participant is searching for sources and connections by making sense of patterns, and in identifying a Gestalt to reconcile passions within the self. The focus of such a seeker is to lose oneself in the flow of experience, and to involve oneself within the text that sets it off. In spirituality, seekers find insights about authenticity, the chances of re-enchantment, and the prospects for a moral re-engagement to transform their lives and society today. For many, aesthetic experiences are moments of transcendence enabling them to return to an otherwise bland world refreshed, recharged and transformed. Restructuring Time in aesthetic experience brings a sense of the ecstatic thereby colouring all other reality in its intensity. I argue that the pursuit of spirituality feeds off aesthetic experiences that in turn comprise the on-going personal rhythms essential for self-identity.
Process and method
Spirituality needs then be
creative, dialectical and critical. In this hermeneutical
experiment, it is observed firstly that ecospirituality is
creative. As the engine of creativity, intuition is a
talent worth developing but scholars too often distrust it.
Intuition is the fruitful fillip that can generate ‘compelling
knowledge,’ to get us beyond the predictable into the
unchartered waters of the sublime where we may be more likely to
feel ‘the tug of immortality’ (Malouf). Relevantly here, Canadian contemporary philosopher John Ralston Saul
argues for a recovery of passive intuition, a faculty that is
organic, unmediated, simple and essentially defensive. He says
our obsession with certainty shields us from intuition, "it
marginalizes our imagination and so turns intuition into a
potential wild card."[9]
Saul speaks about an operational vector for recovering personal
truths. So one might define intuition as an unskilled potential
for seeing and acting that is genuine for being an unmediated
impetus for action. It is a powerful dynamic for attaining truth
and for effecting the transformation of persons.
Notably
too, spirituality is dialectical – it deals with "limit situations"
such a pain, loss and death where language fails. That attempt
speaks towhat is in the heart. In the aesthetic imagination,
believers frame such limit experiences within bigger patterns so
as to understand the exigencies of life and endure suffering
more tolerably. People building spirituality bridge both the
experiential and the theological cultures by generating meanings
and refreshing insights that raise affectivity. Building
spirituality rests on the tenet that change is possible when
consciousness changes.
Aware of the pits of
arbitrariness in subjectivity, this hermeneutic must also be
critical, challenging actants to improve their lives to
intimate, resonate and encapsulate personal truth for the common
good. A robust spirituality dares to expose the radical
contingency of human life and deal with the reality of pain.
‘Reading’ the beach for spirituality is
an exercise of contextual theology. In this hermeneutical and
theological task, we read beyond the text ‘for surplus’ to
create our own new texts in front of the beach’s environmental
texts. That
process is defensible for the search for transcendence is always
contextualised in living situations and recognisable
circumstances, with the result that our needs, aspirations and
dreams genuinely grow from a life focus. Seekers of spirituality
find crossovers to intensify their spiritual nourishment with
reflection on life themes. Indeed Malouf[10]
suggests that writers have the duty . . . to provide an
experience of the imagination that will have the . . . effect
of immediate illumination and understanding. So for our
immediate purpose, this meditation upon life at the beach evokes
retrieval, restoration and refreshment. The current
hermeneutical and aesthetic task seeks to connect inherited
faith with ‘readings’ from life experience, to be validated by
the coherences and valency they offer for re-igniting hope.
This exercise in contextual theology
reads for responsibility. The reading the beach experience
recognises the “thick” textures in response to the common human
challenges that face us all. It celebrates the land- and
seascapes of the beach. It reads the litoral beyond the literal;
that is to say, the theological reading begins with sensual
perception in all its richness to begin to consider some more
metaphysical dimensions and meanings gleaned in times spent at
the beach. Such readings for responsibility resist the
irrationalities and insensitivities operating in a society
becoming more dissociated from transcendence. They seek a more
holistic view found in moral mandates and respect for our lands
and seas. The data revealed in this meditation then are the
insights of moral intensity won in experiences had at the beach.
Conveniently,
deconstruction and postmodernism have presented writers and
thinkers with a new set of analytic tools for conducting such an
inquiry. Within this newfound freedom, we now have the
opportunity to meld environmental insights with traditional expressions of faith,
and to discover newer expressions in the eternal quest to find
meaning in human experience. This “hermeneutical hankering”
makes meaningful what has become irrelevant, unattainable or
meaningless. For an exercise of the theological imagination
operates in the discovery of self-transcendence and its
validation. In particular, this present hermeneutical reading of
beach experiences is a complex cameo on what happens when people
come together on holiday, in those “blessed moments when power
and ideology are absent” (Les A. Murray.)[11]
To identify the dynamic, some
today read modern art, particularly the non-referential
paintings of Mark Rothko, who was celebrated for his ability to
communicate through deceptively simple paintings, as spaces for
the imagination to create experiences that can be savoured. In
them the object of the viewer’s address is not defined
with the result that the art lets that address live, “the art
creates the space for that address.” In addressing such an
artwork, the viewer’s experience is said to be liberated. This
term address is the
key to understanding the dynamic for our purposes here too.
Address is a focusing of attention, both the mind’s attention
and the body’s sensory involvement. The term describes engaging
with the artwork.
The application
Having dealt with methodology, we now apply the model. The beach is a relatively non-referential focus for the senses, one that sets off an address as one takes it in and allows the imagination to travel free of any given human references. In a painting we might see people at work or at leisure and the painting offers human points of reference to which we attach our responses. Similarly, in experiencing the beach as the object of our address, the dynamic goes like this: one’s address sets off engagement that can become a conversation that in turn can lead to a ‘conversion’. That conversion is the sudden grasping of the text that changes one’s whole attitude to it and that leads to what Schleiermacher classed as an “inner feeling of connectedness.” That surely is the goal of spirituality being achieved in those three steps: addressing, engagement, and conversion/transformation.
In this regard, Berkeley academic Niklaus Largier[12] describes how transcendence is invoked when one is addressing something that is beyond. The address takes you beyond yourself; it takes one to the horizon of communication. Thus, prayer is seen to be a rhetorical address, the place where this address happens and the practice that makes it present. He notes how the real SELF is emergent only in the ACT of the prayer. An address typically begins with reading a text. In religion an address begins in reading scriptures. He notes how a chosen text has something spiritual within it, so that in reading that text, devotees engage with it to liberate the spirit of the text. More experienced readers reach the point where the text really speaks to them deeply. By reading it more and more, one becomes deeply affected sensually, emotionally and spiritually by the text. One becomes a reader “affected by the text”. The art of reading permits them to become moved by that text. The text speaks according to how one addresses the text, so that the text communicates itself. By engaging in various ways of reading, readers open up their hearts to the chosen text and so the text in turn addresses them significantly and uniquely.
To put it another way, ‘reading’ such a text involves three levels: the first is a highly experiential reading where one is absorbed into the text; the second is the conversation to make meaning of its various figurative ways and tropes so one can emulate and live the text; and the third is where the reading challenges itself so that one is transformed by it, so much so that one can grasp the moment of suspense we call transcendence. That is in fact the prize of the capture and rapture so lost in modernity.
In effect, a spiritual text offers a story though which you see yourself explained and thus it becomes the story of one’s life. Reading such a text then activates the imagination so that ‘reading’ it is like a theatrical performance in one’s head where the imagination lets itself be challenged by limit positions and marginal situations in order to explore and overcome the text itself. The text eventually inscribes itself into one’s body and infuses one’s life overcoming many limitations and promising fruits.
So this dynamic is transferable. My original contribution here is to apply this method to the text of the beach. I take the beach as my text for its multiple evocations, moods and possibilities. I offer the text of the beach as having potential to release spiritual meanings so I begin the three step process of reading it deeply, experiencing it fully and sensually, and become absorbed in the text. I engage in a conversation with this rich text exploring its various meanings for me so I can ‘liberate its spirit’. I may even climb into intensity with it to locate my life story within this text and let it ‘tell my story’. Finally, I test my reading of this text with common limit situations to see how it can meet expectations for stability, coherence and connectedness with life and the world. That to me is the process of building a spirituality.
The dynamic
seeks to access the sacred, to go beyond immediate
predictabilities and clichés to reach the more sacred free
space of questions and creativity. In this process, the sacred
lies in clean simplicity, and health and welfare subsists in
freedom from intoxications. So as their cognate, the beach
offers a remedy surpassing what more complex therapies can
ever achieve. That remedy is a better re-connection with the
planet, for becoming more responsible, for building
sustainability and environmental conservation. In reading the
eternal restlessness of the waves, the exposure and closure of
the tides, the slow erosion of beach and cliffs, the eternal
search for food by fish, readers of nature (or insightful
visionaries in Gadamer’s sense) will find food for hope and
therapeutics in the sacred presences discovered in its cycles.
Thus the beach
becomes one’s prayer space, the ‘congregation’ is the fellow
sun worshippers, beach inhabitants, surfers and those arriving
early and staying late. The beach is my sacred text that I
read as the catalyst for liberating its spirit within me
(“watching or the right wave.” The beach is a sacred icon, an
idealised window to the divine. The wind is incense, the sand
my ground of being and the water its daily baptism. The sea
itself supplies the daily communion of fish, prawns, mussels,
and dried seaweed all readily available and nutritious. At the
beach experiences offer an edgy experience in that tenuous
balance between finite and infinite, life and death, pleasure
and pain, inspiration and hedonism. In that relatively
non-referential space one can feel free to engage in a
worthwhile meditation upon change, mortality and the search
for meaning.
So in summary
then as a source and catalyst of spirituality, the beach:
·
offers continuity in ready access 24/7 for
it is dependable
·
is bigger than oneself and so offers
transcendence
·
works through incremental processes,
undergoing gradual changes while constantly renewing itself in
its constantly changing shoreline and sandbars
·
models long-suffering in dealing with
tidal challenges
·
is regenerative for it brings one back to
‘the real’
·
grants freedom and space to breathe
individuality
·
rewards engagement many times over
·
feeds, inspires and explains much ordinary
living
·
offers contact with a life force
·
offers challenge as an irresistible
natural force, to be reckoned with
·
demands humility for the beach needs to be
treated with respect, and
·
the beach gathers other devotees who share
their passion.
Refreshing
experiences
The first
phase in the process of growing a spirituality of an ‘at the
beach’ experience is to enjoy the raw experience of
the beach itself. Our script could go like this. On arrival,
the sea air fills the lungs and the blinding sunlight
temporarily blinds you. The tang of the familiar ocean excites
images in memory. “Ah,” you say, “We’re here. Why’ve we been
away so long?” as you plunge into the endless space of an
Australian beach. Perhaps for some it is a daily experience.
But for most, it is a dream lived once a year. At the apparent
edge of the universe, the beach experience and the refreshment
of the beach offer practical sources for refreshment. In
effect, by immersing oneself in the beach experience, one can
leave chronological time and enter the
time of kairos,
that is, opportunity for decision, change and even repentance.
On the second
level, reflection
upon ‘at the beach’ grants an abundance of notable
experiences. Primarily, the beach is a step into vastness –
the wide expanse of sand, the dazzling blue of the sea, the
exciting unpredictability of the waves, the very real pressure
of the moving air – all of it saturates the senses. The long
wide arc of the beach, the certainty of the level horizon, its
vivid colours, scents and sensations hurl us into itself,
embrace us body and soul in raw ambiance. There is nothing
quite like the open beach, as a revelation after the cool
gloom of the dunes, in an encounter with what is primal,
essential and original. The beach is the edge of the land, the
final destination for explorers, the staging place for
holidays and for most Australians is the place of romantic
beginnings. Typically first sex happens in its exciting
environment. In that vastness, with its own cycles, whispers,
and roars, one meets the most eternal in the most elemental
together. Dynamically, the beach refreshes and shapes life
narratives.
Thirdly, the
three-step method seeks applications. Here
the beach experience refreshes by stripping off past
perceptions to ready us for life’s surprises. It can analogise
the human journey inspiring insightful inhabitants about the
realities of suffering tsunamai damage and enduring a slow
recovery, or worse, the trauma of shipwreck or oil spill.
Observing how nature deals with such events inspires the
ecospiritualist to learn patience, endurance and resilience.
Indeed, the
beach can be a place of transformations. Holidays at the beach
bring rest and refreshment especially over New Year. The
beaching of whales evokes an outpouring of care and concern
even pathos.
With a greater
intensity of reflection, we come to value a tantalising
paradox in the fact that the ocean, a clear symbol of
transformation, is itself unpotable. While the land thirsts
for water, we cannot drink the sea. As the source of life and
in its cycles of erosion and repair, the ocean’s own life
models our uncertain human attempts to secure a foothold upon
the eternal. Perceived thus to be expressing the paradoxes of
time among the constant swirl of circumstances, the ocean
contiguous with the beach offers a sharing in refreshment and
a denial too of access to its secrets. Bathing grants only a
limited share of its treasures.
To repair the
ware and tear in the waves of modern life, experiences of the
beach refresh by widening experience. To experience the beach
is to open one’s sense pathways and to open one’s heart, to
‘loosen up’. Beyond the immediacy of one’s own concerns, the
beach experience can heighten responsibility. For example,
refreshed perceptions may perceive the sea mollusc in the rock
pools[13] as reflecting
the activity and the creative presence of the creator and
sustainer of life itself. Whereas Auden’s celebrated poem
“Dover Beach” is a heart-felt cry of despair, for holidaying
Australians the beach is an experience of rejuvenation,
renewal and refreshment. Enraptured by its rituals, habitues of the beach
re-connect with themselves and the earth.
In many ways
then, the beach experience broadens the parameters of
experience and for believers focuses faith in Providence. The
beach grants greater freedom, it devises its own etiquette,
and it offers a new perspective with which to judge one’s
life. So as well as offering new experiences, the beach
intensifies experience, heightens perceptions and offers fresh
perspectives.
Lending intensities
Socially, the beach is great theatre; it is
inherently democratic. In his poem “The
Buladelah-Taree Holiday Song Cycle,”[14] poet
Les A. Murray depicts the world of surfers at play like
warriors:
The
warriors watch waves break and are reserved, refusing
pleasantry;
They
joke only with fellow warriors, chaffing about try-ons and the
police.[15]
At the beach, there is no clear divide
between the sophisticated and the instinctive, the truly human
and the veneer behaviour expected by society. At the beach
people feel perfectly free. The beach is where people gather,
exercise, bathe and relax. We see here many forms of human
behaviour: the zest of the young men, the love of young couples,
the frolics of children, the care of parents and the dignity of
the elderly. We also see much there that is ostentatious,
wasteful, crass, vulgar, cheap and increasingly, and what denies
others their human rights.
In Murray’s use of ‘the
numinous’, this distinctively poet builds bridges between the
ordinary and the spiritual, accessing immanence and ‘making
room’[16]
for the numinous to make meaning of life. Murray for instance
integrates his beliefs with the vernacular culture where most
Australians live. For
instance, this
poem’s texture is rich in themes for recognising the initial
grace of the gift of creation, for disposing the
holidaymakers in the abundant summer environment towards change,
and for invoking justification and renewal of their inner selves
as they peel off the old year’s dialectics and put on
transformation. The poem dramatises how the summer cycle
triggers transformation in each and every element both human and
organic within the seasonal movement of the whole.
Private
beaches overseas are so alien to our experience of beach here.
In the Australian experience, the common access to and
ownership of the beach repulses territorial claims to this or
that area, this or that privileged access or view. The 2006
Maroubra riots were an aberration arising from darker forces
threatening that time-honoured tenet. Like the use of the air
and water, the Australian beach is for everyone. On the beach,
everyone wants to get along, so beach etiquette has developed,
which could be stated as, “Annoy no one and no one will annoy
you.” Such traditions and customs structure everyday
relationships for harmony and peacefulness there.
Pre-eminently
at the beach, beach-goers express their liberty and grow
identities. Les Murray’s poetry celebrates the life of the
body; he rates events and life experiences as valuable and
significant intimations of divine presence. Murray describes
its quality as sprawl,[17] for it so
frees us from demands to meet social, cultural, educational
and societal expectations, standards and frames of reference
to grant personal identity. Sprawl is an expression of one’s
basic humanity, that apparently anti-intellectual
unselfconsciousness that allows others to be themselves. As an
experience of sprawl, the beach grants individuals a unique
freedom over any constricting and potentially deadening
conformity. Seen as the time to sprawl, the beach lends new
intensities to what is basic about choices, our liberties and
ourselves with insights about providence.
In that vast
space of air and sea in a seeming eternity of opportunity and
renewals, the board rider dreams of the perfect wave, the
teenager dreams of the perfect romance and the retired dream
of perfect rest. The sea-change experience has been well
documented as an attempt to retrieve some personal space after
the crowding of the cities. In that space for dreaming, the
open beach does not represent loneliness as much as a better
time and place to recover the self that is so fractured and
fragmented by modern demands. The beach experience lives the
cycle of days and
the extent of hours from dawn through noon to nightfall. It
accesses an eternity in the escape of fishing with a surf rod. In fact, the
experience of the beach’s immensity and “eternity” echo and
evoke the search for permanent happiness. Recovery, retrieval
and recreation gained at the beach framing views of this
life’s pleasures and troubles by taking its cue from the
environmental elements and processes.
For the nation too, the living beach location is
a locus of collective memory. Now in this centenary year of
the ANZAC landings at Anzac Cove, Gallipoli, our soldiers
crossing that fatal shore is the focus of powerful lengends
around that significant historic event. This year, that
particular beach focuses the nation's attention as never
before. Multiple poster and filmic images of the beach
landings celebrate that site of heroism, self sacrifice,
suffering, courage, bravery and defeat. Historical commentary,
reflection and commemorations focus on that event at that
place. That beach bears unique scars as the scene of
paradoxes, the birth of a nation's identity, and now food for
its spiritual consciousness. The contours of that sea and
landscape define our nation's spiritual heritage. The annual
commemorations each April 25th set up the nation's spiritual
rhythm. Striking re-enactments there and here remind us all
that it was at the beach that our nation was born, and at the
beach our men are buried. Later, Slessor's poem "Beach
Burial" further refined our collective attachment to
that locus genii (spirit of place), for it is not only a great
social leveller in life and in recreation, but also in death.
Images of the beach landing lend collective intensities to the
grief, pain and pride of the national spiritual inheritance.
On
the other hand, the immensity
and intensity of the beach can erase illusions and grant a
kind of forgiveness destroying the
tapes of our past, to erase them and discard them. It is
said that Albert Camus always sought a swim in the warm
Algerian sea to wash off existential angst.
The beach grants such a forgiveness – lending its intensity to
molify unhappy memories and to relativise hurts. It is the
unfortunate habit of some people constantly to revisit their
pasts, and look for the points where they took the wrong turn,
where they made the wrong decision, when everything started to
fall apart, by dissecting past mistakes and dragging
themselves over the coals again and again. But in the
beach experience and on holiday, much of that painfully
unnecessary examination is passed over and dispensed with.
Submitting to its present time, to the immensity of the beach
and its different rhythms can be like submitting to endless
forgiveness. This ‘environmental spirituality’ works to deal
with the past.
Applications:
Yielding greater understandings
On this third
and more symbolic level, in its progression of tides, cycles
and seasons, the beach can foreshadow the incremental advance
of mankind’s liberation. At the edge of experience, the
litoral reads beyond the literal. In that process, we sense
more starkly some paradoxes, for the beach is both destructive
in its excess and creative in its processes. Intensifying that
experience, one comes to view this life’s cares and troubles
within a bigger perspective for dealing with the paradoxes of
imperfection, mediocrity, pain, and naked evil and unseen
catastrophes. Most notably, the ocean reminds us of our human
limits and mortality.
Most
relevantly, this experiment in hermeneutics mandates a moral
attitude. An experience of environmental responsibility just
like an encounter with art implies questioning ourselves. Jean
Grondin (1998) notes that an artwork “always has something to
say, speaks to our cognitive and moral sensibilities and
brings them into play.” For inevitably, a work of art helps us
see in more ways than one e.g., sensually, intellectually, and
attentively. Art
requires participation, a response, or what Gadamer calls a
‘reading.’ An aesthetic experience cannot disregard the
truth claims raised by a work of art. So this current
endeavour plots a reading of the text of the natural
environment at the beach as a found artwork, to excite
increased responsibility for it and for the self.
So in its
internal dynamism and irrefutable declaration of limits,
seekers of spirituality find a truer context within nature’s
dynamic artistry at the beach. It is not stretching the bow
too far to claim that beach experiences prefigure and
anticipate “a non violent dreamtime where no one living has
been” (Murray). A faithful reading of the data mandates
environmental responsibility.
By way of practical application to close this section, those living ecospirituality are characterised by:
· sharing a deep love and firm
confidence in the dynamic of their spirituality
· acknowledging the lifestyle they
enjoy at the beach
· respecting his or her spiritual
engagement with beach life and issues
· sharing resistance to the dominant
consumerist and industrialist expansion into beach
environments
· repairing gaps in understanding
and resolving ambiguities about the fate of the Earth
· nurturing dedication to the
dialectic relationship between humans and the beach
· nurturing spiritual
awareness that opens the heart beyond wealth preservation and
consumption to the aspiration of care for others and the local
environment
· engaging in critical reflection
upon threats to the beach environment and culture
· affirming the person’s
connectedness with the web of life and the forces of growth,
healing and continuity
· nurturing compassion and
fulfilment by purifying desires, aspirations, and needs
· affirming the environmental cause
and having a conscience about its cognate issues
· reaffirming one’s the right to
express one’s beliefs and live one’s life in our own way as a
fundamental right of every human being
· encouraging the client’s values of
equality, harmony and brotherly and sisterly community with
all creatures
· assisting similar clients who
conscientiously seek to discern life directions and make
choices inspired by the beach experience
· assisting the client to give
meaning and find direction in life
· revealing the facts, feelings,
faith and freedoms in the person’s life.
In these
sixteen ways, initiates in the beach experience affirm
themselves and their place in the world.
Conclusions
This paper began claiming that people today search for the Eternal or Beauty in ritual, in aesthetics and in fulfilling human encounters. We applied the aesthetic imagination to the natural world. Using it, the insightful actant is able to use this cognitive, aesthetic and mystical steps to dream of justice and right-relatedness.
This paper has
sought to address the second way showing how to read the
silence in the cycles of life at the beach. Reflecting upon
experiences of life at the beach permits us to employ the
aesthetic imagination to better understand the vast richness
and abundance of the Earth. It found that the beach dramatises
humans’ place in nature’s dynamic artistry.
So on three
levels, the beach demands attention. At the perceptual level,
the sand between our toes, the brisk salty breeze, the lulling
of the waves, the mournful cries of the gulls, the squeals of
happy children bombard the senses with an unmediated
interpretative framework for reading nature. Relaxed at the
beach, the mind is liberated to respond to pristine instincts
of our shared humanity. On the aesthetic level, the
natural environment focuses attention. As recipients of its
spiritual nourishment, beach-goers do not pass by its
appearances salamander-like, but are nurtured more deeply in
its harmonious rhythms, ‘pulsing more truly to human nature,
more truly to themselves, (to bowdlerize a line from Judith
Wright). In that discovery of environmental engagement lies an
environmental mandate to accept responsibility for beach
conservation. A spirituality of the Beach experience accesses
this immortal, perennial impulse to care for the environment.
On a third and
more symbolic level
in its dynamism and aspect, the beach experience enacts
humans’ longed for liberation. Advantageously, abiding rituals
at the beach bring humankind nearer to greater dignity, indeed
nearer to shared values. In the same sense that Murray seeks
translations, the experience of the beach ruptures society’s
conventionalities by translating “the invisible to the
tangible and specific.” Murray extols this embodied power of
dreaming the transcendent interfacing human and divine as
being dynamic, possessive and therapeutic all at once. In
particular, At the Beach experiences structure human actions
to be socially harmonious and environmentally responsible. At
the beach then one can suspend chronological
time and enter the time of kairos, with opportunities for creativity and
transformation.
This paper has
argued that a robust spirituality can evolve in aesthetic
experiences. Because our convictions wax and wane on the waves
of modern life, we need time and opportunities to open
ourselves to greater experience; we need opportunities to sift
and understand how experience structures perceptions. To meet
that need, articulated experiences of nature like those at the
beach can intensify spiritual resilience. Just as the beach’s
tides and cycles suggest the perpetual movement and
restlessness of our hearts, a reflective attitude can find new
intensities and more insight into limit experiences so that
what seems less actually grants more. An uncomplicated view
yields many more insights.
This
reflection has offered some appreciation of the worth of
experiences of being at the beach, has suggested that they can
shape and structure our perceptions about worth in the world
and society, and has shown that by intensifying them we can
generate meanings of worth and value for grounding moral
imperatives. Quite truly, no aesthetic experience can
disregard the truth claims art makes, for contemplating both
art and nature raises moral consciousness, as Gadamer
describes. For ethics and
aesthetics are inextricably linked; aesthetics drives ethics.
In
an aesthetic reading for spirituality, numinous presences can
be glimpsed in simple experiences at the beach, the better to
bring us to better states of mind.
This paper arises in a new century more aware of
emergent religious plurality and must be located within that
global context. The paper has shown that while various
religious traditions collected certain stories into their
official sacred books, the Hebrew Scriptures, the Christian
scriptures, the Koran, etc., other expressions of the human
spirit capture, express, raise questions, and point direction
toward the ultimate realities of life. The method shows glimpses of redemption for the Earth and
ourselves in the act of imagination, in imaginative
anticipations of better outcomes. The paper
has examined a specific basis for spirituality not categorized
as formally religious which does, in fact, touch the human
spirit in deeply spiritual ways.
REFERENCES
Ackland, M. “Why
read Australian poetry?” Southerly
57.1 (1997), 183.
Coulson, J. Religion and Imagination: In
aid of a grammar of assent. Oxford: Clarendon, 1981.
Conway, R. Land of the Long Weekend.
Melbourne: Sun Books, 1978 (1980).
Fowler,
J. W. Faithful Change:
The personal and public challenges of postmodern life.
Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1996.
Grondin, J. “Gadamer’s Aesthetics –The
overcoming of aesthetic consciousness and the hermeneutical
truth of art” Trans. M. Kelly, Encyclopaedia of Aesthetics
Vol 2, pp. 267-271. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Hart,
K. The Oxford Book of
Australian Religious Verse. Oxford University Press, 1994.
Kane,
P.
Australian Poetry: Romanticism and
Negativity.
Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Kelly,
A. J. A New Imagining:
Towards an Australian Spirituality. Melbourne: Collins
Dove, 1991.
Largier,
N.
“Lecture 22: Modern Art and religious experience: From baroque
plenitude to modern minimalism.” Religious Studies 90A 001 Fall
2009 UC Berkeley. iTunes podcast accessed 2/8/2013.
Malouf,
D.
Imagining
the Real: Australian Writing in the Nuclear Age, Dorothy Green and David Headon, Eds. Sydney: ABC
Enterprises, 1987.
Malouf, D. The Great World.
London: Chatto & Windus, 1990.
McFague,
S.
‘An Earthly Theological Agenda, Christian Century, 108,
2 January 1991.
Murray, L. A. Collected Poems
1961-2002. Potts Point, NSW: Duffy &
Snellgrove, 2002.
Saul,
J. R. On Equilibrium Camberwell, Vic: Penguin Books,
2001.
Wright, J. Judith Wright: Collected
Poems. Sydney: Angus
& Robertson 2002.
FOR FURTHER READING
Dawe, B. “Tributary streams: Some sources of
social and political concerns in modern Australian poetry” Australian Literary Studies
15.3 (May, 1992), 97-109
Eliot, T. S. The Use of Poetry and the
Use of Criticism. London: Faber and Faber 1933 (1970).
Glasner P. E. “The study of Australian folk
religion: Some theoretical and practical problems.” In A. W.
Black & P. E. Glasner (eds.) Practice and Belief,
pp. 167-180, Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1983.
Kelly,
A. J. “Spirituality: An Australian accent”. The Way Supplement 73,
Spring. London: Heythrop College, 1992, 87-97.
Pearson,
Clive. “Towards
an Australian Ecotheology.” Uniting
Church Studies
Vol. 4, No. 1, March 1998, 1-15.
Rahner, K.
“Poetry and the Christian.” Religious Investigations IV
pp. 357- 367. Baltimore: Helicon, 1966.
Smith,
G. B. Images of
Salvation: A study in theology, poetry and rhetoric. PhD
dissertation 2007. [On-line] Available:
www.openthesis.org/documents/Images-Salvation-study-in-theology-276951.html
___________“The
holy
spirit of larrikinism and irreverence in mid-century Australian
religious verse.” Theology @ McAuley Banyo edition,
February 2003 Issue 3 [on-line] available:
dlibrary.acu.edu.au/research/theology/ ejournal/Issue3/Smith.htm
[2004
June 12].
________ “Walking knee-deep in ferns:
Salvational themes in the poetry of Les A. Murray” Australian
Ejournal of Theology August 2004 edition 3 [on-line]
available:
dlibrary.acu.edu.au/research/theology/ejournal/aejt_3/Smith.htm
[2005 April 6].
________ “Communing with David Malouf:
Considerations upon salvation” Paper delivered at the Biennial
Conference in Philosophy, Religion and Culture: “On
The Good, Goods And The Good Life” Catholic Institute
Sydney 2 October 2004. Unpublished monograph available upon
request.
________ “Communing with David Malouf:
Considerations upon salvation.” Australian Ejournal of
Theology 2005, No 4 [on-line] available:
dlibrary.acu.edu.au/research/theology/ejournal/aejt_4/gregsmith.htm
[2005 April 6].
________ “Striking the metaphysical
chord: How the gifts of nature image salvations.” Australian
Ejournal of Theology August 2005 issue 5 [on-line]
available:
dlibrary.acu.edu.au/research/theology/ejournal/aejt_5/GregSmith.htm
[2005 August 9].
________ “We are turned into a great
tree: Judith Wright’s strange word about trees” Australian
Ejournal of Theology Issue 7 Pentecost 2006 edition
[on-line] available:
dlibrary.acu.edu.au/research/theology/ejournal/aejt_7/greg.htm
[2006 June 7].
____________________
“Re-Forging Theological Language Through Poetry”
chapter in Priest, Poet
and Theologian: Essays
in honour of Anthony Kelly CSsR. Preston Vic: Mosaic Press, 2013.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Greg Smith PhD
reads and writes in contextual theology, seeking sources for
inspiration and fuses for faith in life and literature. He has
published similar articles in the Australian Ejournal of
Theology. Contact: greg.hub@pacific.net.au
He is the Deputy Academic Dean of the Multifaith Academy for
Chaplaincy and Community Ministries Inc. Brisbane.
Influences and Sources
Related
Article Published:
“Communing with David Malouf: A hermeneutical reading of The Crab Feast” Australian Ejournal of
Theology no 4, 2005.
STUDY QUESTIONS arising from this paper
1.
Spirituality today gives the right tone, the right feel, the
right ‘context giver’ for living well. Can using the aesthetic
imagination supply such a spirituality? How?
2. A theological
reading connects inherited faith with ‘readings’ from life
experience. It begins with sensual perception in all its
richness to begin to consider some more metaphysical dimensions
and meanings gleaned by the perceiver. Use the experience,
reflection, application steps to construct an outline for a
satisfying spirituality.
3. The theological imagination operates in the
discovery of self-transcendence and its validation. Is this a
sufficient basis for spirituality?
4. By constructing
spiritualities, people
seek meaning at depth (in perennial resonances) relevant to
their contexts and their circumstances. They seek
interconnectedness, relationships and transcendence by finding
meaning and deep values in narratives. Give examples of such
stories that comprise ‘spirituality.’
5. Gadamer held that
aesthetics drives ethics so contemplating
both art and nature raise moral consciousness. Seekers of
spirituality find a richer context within nature. Show how this
focus might start a spirituality.
6. Because
we are spiritual beings who seek to engage a connection with the
transcendent in
sacred spaces, meaning making comes in recreating the
past to sustain the present for living the future. Explain how
this is done with some examples.
7.
Respond to this statement in the light of the paper:
Spirituality
comes
through allegiance or commitment, and in rejection of
materialism, commercialism and exploitation. It stresses
individual needs and experiences, and should act to fulfil the
individual’s spiritual needs.
7. When poet Les Murray talks about ‘incarnational
faith’ based on the life of the body, he means a faith-filled
reading of the data of experience. Show how this can be a
suitable basis for spirituality.
PUBLICITY
The paper explores the possibility of
devising a satisfying spirituality upon aesthetic experiences
like the Australian beach. The three fold process values
experience, understands it such as in metaphors, and seeks
applications for life.
The process is based on Gadamer's
hermeneutic where a "reading " mandates moral attitudes and
applications.
The paper envisages a viable
spirituality as a framework for seeking meaning, for explaining
what happens to one and for connecting to the web of life. Such
developed understandings frame daily routines and justify
conservation of the environment.
Greg is the Academic Dean of the
Multifaith Academy Brisbane.
studies@chaplaincyacademy.com
[1] James W. Fowler, Faithful Change: The personal and public challenges of postmodern life. (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1996), p. 9.
[2] Tony Kelly, A New Imagining: Towards an Australian Spirituality. (Melbourne: Collins Dove, 1991), 9.
[3] Ronald Conway, Land of the Long Weekend (Melbourne: Sun Books,1980), p. 13.
[4] A. J. Kelly, A New Imagining: Towards an Australian Spirituality. (Melbourne: Collins Dove, 1991), 17; A. J. Kelly, “Embarrassed Silences: Reflecting on Australian Spirituality”, Religious Education Journal of Australia 4/2 (1988): 4-10.
[5] Wright, “Silence” lines 6-7, Collected Poems (Sydney: Angus & Robertson 2002), 121.
[6] S. McFague, ‘An Earthly Theological Agenda, Christian Century,
108, 2 Jan., 1991, 14.
[7] John Coulson, Religion and Imagination: In aid of a grammar of assent. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1981),145.
[8] David Malouf, The Great World (London: Chatto & Windus 1990), 283.
[9] Saul, J. R. On Equilibrium. (Camberwell, Vic: Penguin Books, 2001) 203.
[10] David Malouf, in Imagining the Real: Australian Writing in the Nuclear Age, Dorothy Green and David Headon,, eds. (Sydney: ABC Enterprises, 1987), 22.
[11] Les A. Murray “The Buladelah-Taree Holiday Song Cycle.” Murray’s sympathetic translation of Aboriginal culture reaches a peak in his long poem, “The Buladelah-Taree Holiday Song Cycle” recovering the genre of an Aboriginal songline to ritualise the translations and transformations that holidays bring. Collected Poems 1961-2002 pp. 137-146.
[12] Niklaus Largier, “Lecture 22: Modern Art and religious experience: From baroque plenitude to modern minimalism.” Religious Studies 90A 001 Fall 2009 UC Berkeley. iTunes podcast accessed 2/8/2013.
[13] “Mollusc” from Murray, Presence: Translations from the Natural World (1992) in Collected Poems 1961-2002, 361. Hereafter CP 2002.
[15]
Canto 9, lines 5-6, CP 2002, 147.
[16] Kane, op. cit., 193.
[17] Murray,“The Quality of Sprawl” from The People’s Otherworld (1983) C.P.2002, 182-3, and in David Lampastato, Upholding Mystery: An anthology of contemporary Christian poetry. (New York: Oxford University Press. 1997), pp.165-166.